Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Dgraph Bulk Load #136

Merged
merged 97 commits into from
Aug 21, 2019
Merged

Support Dgraph Bulk Load #136

merged 97 commits into from
Aug 21, 2019

Conversation

kevinkle
Copy link
Member

Additional Changes:

  • Move lemongraph install into base test image
  • Change Dockerfile entry into prariedog instead of Snakemake
  • Drop support for Py3.5 due to pathlib inconsistencies
  • Support and output directory and sample directory config in Snakefile
  • Add a dgraph rule in Snakefile for running dgraph bulk
  • Implement a custom run_dgraph_bulk() function
  • Silence Dgraph output logs if in --debug not specified, or in CI
  • Add prairiedog Click commands for running dgraph bulk and dgraph ratel
  • Fix preloading of Kmer .rdf
  • Additional support for DgraphBundled subprocess logs
  • Support outputting Dgraph files to a specific directory
  • Additional exception handling for DgraphBundled

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #136 into develop will decrease coverage by 0.44%.
The diff coverage is 68.02%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #136      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage       79%   78.55%   -0.45%     
===========================================
  Files           18       19       +1     
  Lines         1067     1236     +169     
===========================================
+ Hits           843      971     +128     
- Misses         224      265      +41
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
prairiedog/kmers.py 91.66% <100%> (+0.3%) ⬆️
prairiedog/node.py 89.47% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
prairiedog/lemon_graph.py 85.49% <100%> (-1.04%) ⬇️
prairiedog/errors.py 40.9% <33.33%> (-5.25%) ⬇️
prairiedog/cli.py 49.09% <43.33%> (-6.09%) ⬇️
prairiedog/dgraph.py 85.95% <55.55%> (+4.35%) ⬆️
prairiedog/dgraph_bundled.py 77.61% <67.74%> (-18.47%) ⬇️
prairiedog/dgraph_bundled_helper.py 87.09% <87.09%> (ø)
prairiedog/__init__.py 91.66% <88.88%> (-8.34%) ⬇️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 06af24b...6c90091. Read the comment docs.

1 similar comment
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #136 into develop will decrease coverage by 0.44%.
The diff coverage is 68.02%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #136      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage       79%   78.55%   -0.45%     
===========================================
  Files           18       19       +1     
  Lines         1067     1236     +169     
===========================================
+ Hits           843      971     +128     
- Misses         224      265      +41
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
prairiedog/kmers.py 91.66% <100%> (+0.3%) ⬆️
prairiedog/node.py 89.47% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
prairiedog/lemon_graph.py 85.49% <100%> (-1.04%) ⬇️
prairiedog/errors.py 40.9% <33.33%> (-5.25%) ⬇️
prairiedog/cli.py 49.09% <43.33%> (-6.09%) ⬇️
prairiedog/dgraph.py 85.95% <55.55%> (+4.35%) ⬆️
prairiedog/dgraph_bundled.py 77.61% <67.74%> (-18.47%) ⬇️
prairiedog/dgraph_bundled_helper.py 87.09% <87.09%> (ø)
prairiedog/__init__.py 91.66% <88.88%> (-8.34%) ⬇️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 06af24b...6c90091. Read the comment docs.

@kevinkle kevinkle merged commit c4b3d22 into develop Aug 21, 2019
@kevinkle kevinkle deleted the dgraph-bundled-helper branch August 21, 2019 15:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant