No authorization headers available in generated API server

[SonnyRajagopalan]

Hello,

I have my security definitions in the preamble section of my swagger.yaml like so:

securityDefinitions:
  Bearer:
    description: |
      For accessing the API a valid JWT token must be passed in all the queries in
      the 'Authorization' header.
      A valid JWT token is generated by the API and retourned as answer of a call
      to the route /login giving a valid user & password.
      The following syntax must be used in the 'Authorization' header :
       Bearer: header.payload.signature

    type: apiKey
    name: Authorization
    in: header

And the protected routes have this:

  description: |
    blah blah
  tags:
    - Tag                  
  security:
    - Bearer: []

Now, when I launch this using Swagger UI, I see the API showing up the Security section of the authentication for getting the Authorization token. Also, all the protected routes have the check box for the associated security token (Bearer). But, when I generate the node-js server stub and launch the server stub, I no longer see an authentication section of the API, nor it it as being included as a parameter in the body for the protected routes.

Is this normal behavior? If not, what am I missing?

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Sonny.

[webron]

If you have an issue with the generated code, open the ticket on swagger-codegen. It's got nothing to do with the UI.

[SonnyRajagopalan]

FWIW, It is not clear if this is an issue in codegen or UI.

[webron]

Your definition looks correct. If it works as expected in the UI and not in the generated code... the issue is with the codegen

[SonnyRajagopalan]

Fair enough. Thanks for your quick responses. I am going to raise this in codegen.

…

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Ron ***@***.***> wrote: Your definition looks correct. If it works as expected in the UI and not in the generated code... the issue is with the codegen — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2775 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABgyBkjpUcMqCu07Y7-OdUfNSVr_FGiSks5roxGogaJpZM4MnfEl> .

[SonnyRajagopalan]

@webron Sorry to be harping on this, but this also is related to the highly anticipated feature described in https://github.com//issues/1108

I have to second that request. This is kinda basic feature, in my opinion, but again, I harp.

PS: I have raised this in codegen, with no response so far.

[webron]

I don't see how the generate server is related to #1108.