@Success 200 {array} json "{"code":200,"data":model.Account,"msg":"success"}"

[dotecxy]

example (Java generics)
type JsonResult struct{
code int
msg string
data interface{}
}

type Account struct{

}

xxxx
xxx
@success 200 {array} json "{"code":200,"data":model.Account,"msg":"success"}"
func Get() {
a:=Account{}
json:=JsonResult{code:1,msg:"",data=&a}
x.JSON(json)
}

swag init

[pei0804]

？

[ddaggHT]

Think what they are trying to ask for is a way to define a struct for a response directly in the comment rather than having to build out a struct and link it. It would be a nice feature in my opinion as some times I have single variable responses from my api's and having to make a struct with one variable inside of it in order to link it for the docs can get kind of tedious at times.

[ubogdan]

@ddaggHT if you are going to work with json , just declare a standard Response format like the following and you can use it as response in all controllers.

type Response struct {
    Data interface{}
}

or

type Response struct {
    Data string
}

[ubogdan]

Actualy is not a simple response , since "data" is a type of model.Account .
@success 200 {array} json "{"code":200,"data":model.Account,"msg":"success"}"

[ilovesusu]

type Response struct {
Code int json:"code"
Msg string json:"msg"
Data interface{} json:"data"
}
type User struct {
UserId int form:"user_id" json:"user_id" example:"1" primaryKey:"true"
UserName string form:"user_name" json:"user_name" gorm:"type:varchar(16);comment:'用户名'"
}

// @success 200 {object} utils.Response{data:model.User} "{"code":0,"data":model.User,"msg":"ok"}"

this's good ,but it don't worker

[lzz001]

Has the above problem been solved?

[lzz001]

Think what they are trying to ask for is a way to define a struct for a response directly in the comment rather than having to build out a struct and link it. It would be a nice feature in my opinion as some times I have single variable responses from my api's and having to make a struct with one variable inside of it in order to link it for the docs can get kind of tedious at times.

I have the same problem

[sdghchj]

Reference #651 .
@dotecxy @lzz001