minor changes to sway.5.scd

[quinnyo]

A couple of minor changes to the hide_edge_borders description.

• now refers to the correct smart_borders option ('smart' -> 'on')

• more consistent use of emphasis

[kennylevinsen]

Does this still render correctly through scdoc? The underscore sequence does look like something that could break it (_on_|_no_gaps_)...

[quinnyo]

It seems to be fine, I borrowed the syntax from the line above (and elsewhere in the file) as I was unsure myself. Diffing the output from scdoc gives:

1086,1087c1086,1087
< options are equivalent to setting \fIsmart_borders\fR smart|no_gaps and
< \fIhide_edge_borders\fR none.\&
---
> options are equivalent to setting smart_borders \fIon\fR|\fIno_gaps\fR and
> hide_edge_borders \fInone\fR.\&

[emersion]

Ideally the whole command ("smart_borders on|no_gaps") should be underlined I think?

[quinnyo]

I don't know. I just looked around the file to see how it was done.
Almost every underlined bit of text is a parameter.
There are a lot of mentions of commands without any markers.
I think there are more commands in bold than underlined, not including the ones used as headings.

[emersion]

Bold is used for command definitions. Underline is used for references.

[quinnyo]

Hi, hopefully that's OK now! Apologies for generating so much back and forth over this 😊