You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2021. It is now read-only.
This reverts commit f9f90b4.
gbm_bo_get_modifier may return a modifier in these cases:
- The kernel doesn't support modifiers but Mesa does
- WLR_DRM_NO_MODIFIERS=1 is set
However, in both of these cases, the gbm_bo has been allocated
without modifiers.
There is already a check in drm_fb_create for modifiers:
wlr_drm_format_set_has will make sure buffers with an explicit
modifier will be rejected if the DRM backend doesn't support them.
So no need for an additional check in get_fb_for_bo.
Closes: swaywm#2896
This reverts commit f9f90b4.
gbm_bo_get_modifier may return a modifier in these cases:
- The kernel doesn't support modifiers but Mesa does
- WLR_DRM_NO_MODIFIERS=1 is set
However, in both of these cases, the gbm_bo has been allocated
without modifiers.
There is already a check in drm_fb_create for modifiers:
wlr_drm_format_set_has will make sure buffers with an explicit
modifier will be rejected if the DRM backend doesn't support them.
So no need for an additional check in get_fb_for_bo.
Closes: #2896
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
f9f90b4 from #2885 has lead to a regression for me when using WLR_DRM_NO_MODIFIERS=1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: