Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 19, 2023. It is now read-only.

proxy-membership.md: Allow proxy members #23

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 12, 2015

Conversation

wking
Copy link
Contributor

@wking wking commented Mar 10, 2015

Robert doesn't like proxies (pp200-201), with the following two
reasons:

  • Non-members functioning as proxies breach the secrecy of
    members-only meetings.
  • Members functioning as proxies unbalance the equality of members.

With a small, volunteer committee, I feel like the increased
perspective provided by proxy members outweighs the breach of secrecy.
Committee members are appointing proxies at their discretion, so they
are free to appoint trustworthy proxies or not appoint proxies at all
for particularly sensitive issues. I estimate the risk of such
proxies leaking sensitive information is small, and the gain of having
a full complement of seven acting committee members is worth the risk.

I agree with Robert on the importance of balance within the committee,
so I've explicitly disallowed any (proxy) member from controlling
multiple votes.

Fixes #11.

Robert doesn't like proxies (pp200-201 of [1]), with the following two
reasons:

* Non-members functioning as proxies breach the secrecy of
  members-only meetings.
* Members functioning as proxies unbalance the equality of members.

With a small, volunteer committee, I feel like the increased
perspective provided by proxy members outweighs the breach of secrecy.
Committee members are appointing proxies at their discretion, so they
are free to appoint trustworthy proxies or not appoint proxies at all
for particularly sensitive issues.  I estimate the risk of such
proxies leaking sensitive information is small, and the gain of having
a full complement of seven acting committee members is worth the risk.

I agree with Robert on the importance of balance within the committee,
so I've explicitly disallowed any (proxy) member from controlling
multiple votes.

[1]: https://archive.org/details/Robertsrulesofor00robe_201303
@wking wking mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2015
@katyhuff
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @wking ! Thanks for this PR. The Steering Committee voted to approve this! Thanks so much for your contribution to the clarity of our operations!

katyhuff added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2015
proxy-membership.md: Allow proxy members
@katyhuff katyhuff merged commit 3a6b7a6 into swcarpentry:master Mar 12, 2015
@wking wking deleted the proxies branch March 12, 2015 21:58
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Proxy committee membership
2 participants