Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Misleading wording in 02-func-R #146

Closed
mxtthias opened this issue Oct 6, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Misleading wording in 02-func-R #146

mxtthias opened this issue Oct 6, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@mxtthias
Copy link
Contributor

mxtthias commented Oct 6, 2015

The first Tip in the file starts with this sentence:

"One feature unique to R is that the return statement is not required."

This feature is far from unique to R. So called "implicit returns" are found in a variety of languages, Erlang, Ruby, and Rust are just three examples.

I would prefer something like "In R, it is not necessary to include the return statement."

@jdblischak
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the suggestion, @mxtthias. Would you be able to submit a Pull Request with your suggested change made to the file 02-func-R.Rmd?

@mxtthias
Copy link
Contributor Author

mxtthias commented Oct 6, 2015

@jdblischak: Created #147

@jdblischak
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed by #147.

rgaiacs added a commit to rgaiacs/swc-r-novice-inflammation that referenced this issue May 6, 2017
…ckpoint

make sure that checkpoint version is 0.4.0 or higher
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants