Set up a forum. #196
Comments
I think that this is a great idea and I'd be happy to play a role in stewarding/moderating. (Sorry to miss the lab meeting discussion the first time around.) |
On 17.11.2013 23:06, Justin Kitzes wrote:
I would also be happy to moderate, and I am also sorry I missed the lab KarinKarin Lagesen, Ph.D. |
What other forums you've used that have (or haven't) worked well What features you want
How you'd like it to fit into the rest of what we do
|
On 11/27/13 2:56 PM, lexnederbragt wrote:
IME, most people really just need help defining their questions. Once KarinKarin Lagesen, Ph.D. |
I agree with most of the points have already been said, but I like the feature from stackexchange where the question (and the answers) can be edited by the author and by others. That helps to keep it cleaner and more concise. One thing I don't like from standard forums is having to browse hundreds of pages under a thread to get to an answer, they are good for discussions as a mailing list, but I don't think they are good for Qs&As sites. I've also used astrobabel which is similar to biostars and stackexchange. It's based in vanilla forums which has an active community of developers on github and a lot of addons to customize the site. I'm not sure though if this allows edit other peoples answers as I suggested above. Neither I've found whether it can suggest related questions on the side, or interactively find similar questions when typing one. The rest of the features requested by @lexnederbragt seems fine. From my experience it seems the astrophysics community in general is "scared" to ask questions in public forums... maybe it's the barrier some of the other sites have imposed... but definitely we have to help to make everyone to feel comfortable (and that's where our job comes in!) |
@dpshelio Agree with possibility to edit questions and answers. The Biostars software can do that. |
I wonder if those answering questions could be encouraged to take more of a "sherpa" role: directing those asking questions to good sources of information in other locations, including stackexchange. This is an extension of the point made by @karinlag about helping (re)define the question. We could certainly provide part of the answer on our own forum, but also provide a gentler on-ramp to other communities like SE. Put another way, should one of our implicit goals be to launch users into other Q&A communities, rather than keep them in the SWC Q&A community forever? |
On 12/2/13 4:01 PM, Paul Wilson wrote:
I really like this way of thinking about it, and I really like the title KarinKarin Lagesen, Ph.D. |
I propose we set up the BioStar forum (https://github.com/ialbert/biostar-central) on Software Carpentry - any objections? |
That looks good to me. |
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 02:17:02PM -0800, Greg Wilson wrote:
I find this quote from the biostar-central README.md 1 a bit Note: If database models change you must reset and reinitialize the I suppose that just means Django migrations are going to be carried |
6 months ago or so I tried to get some feedback on the discuss list about using something like this, I've been intrigued by the approach taken by the Discourse project. Heroku has chosen it to power their forums. I've rehydrated the instance I set-up, and have it running again temporarily here: At the time I was evaluating options in this category, I was specifically hoping to find one that leveraged persona login, and this does (in addition to Google auth etc). I also think something like this could replace many of the mailing lists, since you can configure your membership to be behave more like a mail list, or more like a forum depending on your inclinations. |
@ptone - I like it! I think there are a lot of advantages with handling our team communication and planning on a place like Discourse, as opposed to the Git-centric GitHub, which has mostly minimal features for discussion. I'm +1 for trying it out as a potential alternative to Discuss. |
From the Discourse FAQ: Should I switch to Discourse right now? Probably not... Discourse is brand new. Discourse is early beta software, and likely to remain so for many months. Please experiment with it, play with it, give us feedback, submit pull requests – but any consideration of fully adopting Discourse is for people and organizations who are eager to live on the bleeding and broken edge. |
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 09:41:50PM -0800, Preston Holmes wrote:
Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 03:38:42PM -0800, Greg Wilson:
On the other hand, @ptone has set it up already and seems willing to |
A very valid comment on the Discourse is beta caveat. But I'd say they are in late beta, and pretty near production ready. Truth is, running any OSS forum software takes a certain amount of sysadmin & admin work. There are databases that need regular backup, tables that may need pruning, etc. This is not just a static site in github. I can't say I'd be able to commit to keeping up operations for something like Discourse, but I'd be happy to get it up and running initially. As far as Biostars, it would be interesting to see if the author would be willing to help set it up and maintain for SWC given the bioinformatics connection. It is Django based, so of course I'm going to say that is a plus, but it really is a 1 person project, not exactly a community project. https://github.com/ialbert/biostar-central/graphs/contributors I know budget is not expansive, but a paid option might be worth it if this were to prove valuable to the mission. I know that I've been impressed with Ning in the past for a "community tool" out of the box. But I think this category of tool has to prove its value before any funds would be used on it. Also it is not clear whether the call was for something purely Q&A oriented, or more of a classical forum mode tool? I know one of the changes over time that warranted this retry was growth in size to a more critical mass - but I'm a little torn between the value and lessons learned through some pilot/limited trial, vs the value of just starting the snowball with more snow, such that it might have a better shot of picking up steam. |
I think they actually serve different functions, so I would be okay with having both. I consider the Q&A tool to be a different project than expanding our forum offerings. As @wking just noted on discuss, I'm up for trying to move non-essential announcements and discussions over to Discourse. I logged in using my Google account (it also sets up Persona) and created a new test topic here: http://192.81.211.197/t/arons-very-own-test-post/11 |
@gvwilson, can you share the resolution here? Has this been completed successfully, or is it being tabled? The links above to http://192.81.211.197 aren't working for me. |
The forum has been created; we're waiting on a decision from higher up |
At the November lab meeting, we decided to try setting up a forum for Q&A aimed primarily at bootcamp attendees (but possibly open to others as well). http://software-carpentry.org/blog/2013/11/creating-a-forum has some background; please add comments to this issue if you'd like to discuss:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: