Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SSR STEC and gridded correction message refinements #704

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 24, 2019
Merged

Conversation

ljbade
Copy link
Contributor

@ljbade ljbade commented Jun 21, 2019

Further refinements to the SSR STEC and gridded correction messages for consistency with the existing SSR messages.

I also fleshed out the description and unit fields to make it easier for someone to use the messages without having to cross reference back to the CLAS spec.

@ljbade ljbade requested a review from martin-swift June 21, 2019 10:48
message to get the state space representation of the atmospheric
delay.
delay. It is typically equivalent to the QZSS CLAS Sub Type 8 messages
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wanted to put a reference to the CLAS message since you have to use the correction algorithm from that document. This way someone not familiar will know where to go find the details

- MSG_SSR_STEC_CORRECTION:
id: 0x05EB
short_desc: Slant Total Electron Content
desc: |
The STEC per space vehicle, given as polynomial approximation for
a given grid. This should be combined with SSR-GriddedCorrection
a given grid area. This should be combined with MSG_SSR_GRIDDED_CORRECTION
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure why we need "area". We have a grid that has been defined. Of course a grid covers an area; I feel like this is tautological and thus more confusing.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure i can drop that

@ljbade ljbade merged commit b31e849 into master Jun 24, 2019
@ljbade ljbade deleted the ljbade/stec branch June 24, 2019 08:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants