New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move Minmod implementation into a .tpp file #1429
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
071a83b
Move Minmod work into .tpp file
fmahebert 2652e0a
Avoid type-erasure work in Minmod
fmahebert 19581d6
Add explicit Minmod instantiation for Burgers system
fmahebert dcdbbc8
Add explicit Minmod instantiation for ValenciaDivClean system
fmahebert File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | ||
// Distributed under the MIT License. | ||
// See LICENSE.txt for details. | ||
|
||
#include "Evolution/DiscontinuousGalerkin/SlopeLimiters/Minmod.tpp" // IWYU pragma: keep | ||
#include "Evolution/Systems/Burgers/Tags.hpp" // IWYU pragma: keep | ||
#include "Utilities/TMPL.hpp" | ||
|
||
// IWYU pragma: no_include "Evolution/DiscontinuousGalerkin/SlopeLimiters/Minmod.hpp" | ||
|
||
template class SlopeLimiters::Minmod<1, tmpl::list<Burgers::Tags::U>>; |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think we should generalize this to
LimiterInstantiations.cpp
and instantiate all limiters there?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I see it: the advantages to grouping the instantiations into a single file are (a) having fewer files and (b) making it easier to see what limiters are available for each system; the downside is having to re-instantiate all limiters when one limiter changes. Are there other considerations that I am missing?
At the moment I do not have a strong opinion on the matter, so I am happy to make the change if you prefer it. Just let me know what you think 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Those are the only two things I can think of. Given that the number of limiters we will have will be < 10 (or at least given the current literature it seems unlikely to exceed 10) I think having separate files so that the compilation can be parallelized better is a good thing :)