Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproducing performance on DTU #35

Open
hongsukchoi opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

Reproducing performance on DTU #35

hongsukchoi opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@hongsukchoi
Copy link

Hi, I read the main manuscript and supplementary material, but can't find the training detail for DTU dataset.
How many epochs did you train on DTU dataset?
I trained quite a lot, but cannot reproduce the table 3 here.

@danperazzo
Copy link

danperazzo commented Jul 23, 2021

Hello @hongsukchoi, I think I managed to reproduce it, or at least got close to it. I trained in the default setting (only with the batch size reduced by 2 from the default 4) and took about 300~ epochs to converge (about 4-5 days with an RTX 2080Ti). My model got a PSNR of 18.499 and an SSIM of 0.679 on the 3 views DTU evaluation.

@colorful-liyu
Copy link

Hello @hongsukchoi, I think I managed to reproduce it, or at least got close to it. I trained in the default setting (only with the batch size reduced by 2 from the default 4) and took about 300~ epochs to converge (about 4-5 days with an RTX 2080Ti). My model got a PSNR of 18.499 and an SSIM of 0.679 on the 3 views DTU evaluation.

hello, I am trying to reproduce it on the DTU, too. But every epoch takes about 2.5 hours with 3 RTX 2080Ti, for it repeats DTU 32 times in one epoch. I was wondering how could it run 300 epochs during 4-5 days with an RTX 2080Ti.

@TianyuDai
Copy link

Hello @hongsukchoi, I think I managed to reproduce it, or at least got close to it. I trained in the default setting (only with the batch size reduced by 2 from the default 4) and took about 300~ epochs to converge (about 4-5 days with an RTX 2080Ti). My model got a PSNR of 18.499 and an SSIM of 0.679 on the 3 views DTU evaluation.

Hello @danperazzo , thank you for your information! Could I ask why do you reduce batch size from 4 to 2?

@joejep
Copy link

joejep commented May 23, 2023

Hello @hongsukchoi, I think I managed to reproduce it, or at least got close to it. I trained in the default setting (only with the batch size reduced by 2 from the default 4) and took about 300~ epochs to converge (about 4-5 days with an RTX 2080Ti). My model got a PSNR of 18.499 and an SSIM of 0.679 on the 3 views DTU evaluation.

I am finding difficulty running pixel-nerf

@joejep
Copy link

joejep commented May 24, 2023

This is the error i got trying to run pixel-nerf

pyparsing.exceptions.ParseSyntaxException: Expected '}', found '=' (at char 759), (line:34, col:18)

@GateraGael
Copy link

GateraGael commented Dec 7, 2023

Hello all, this was resolved in the following thread #62

pip install --force-reinstall -v "pyhocon==0.3.55"

@MathewCrowley
Copy link

Hello @hongsukchoi, I think I managed to reproduce it, or at least got close to it. I trained in the default setting (only with the batch size reduced by 2 from the default 4) and took about 300~ epochs to converge (about 4-5 days with an RTX 2080Ti). My model got a PSNR of 18.499 and an SSIM of 0.679 on the 3 views DTU evaluation.

Hello! When I try to run eval.py, it cannot find con/resnet_fine_mv.conf. How did you solve this problem?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants