Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clojure/elisp support for paxedit #5438

Closed
nha opened this issue Mar 10, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

clojure/elisp support for paxedit #5438

nha opened this issue Mar 10, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
- Mailling list - Feature request stale marked as a stale issue/pr (usually by a bot)

Comments

@nha
Copy link

nha commented Mar 10, 2016

It would be nice to have support for paxedit bindings, in elisp/clojure modes.

Most importantly those (for me at least) :

      (define-key paxedit-mode-map (kbd "M-<right>")   'paxedit-transpose-forward)
      (define-key paxedit-mode-map (kbd "M-<left>")     'paxedit-transpose-backward)
      (define-key paxedit-mode-map (kbd "M-<up>")      'paxedit-backward-up)
      (define-key paxedit-mode-map (kbd "M-<down>") 'paxedit-backward-end)

There seem to be some interest, as asked there also : #627

@arronmabrey
Copy link
Contributor

I just found out about paxedit and decided to come look if it was implemented yet. Subscribing for updates. ;-)

@adg-adg
Copy link

adg-adg commented Sep 14, 2016

Any other developments on this? Seem to be a really powerful mode, useful for many people. Don't know why it's been neglected for a while now.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please let us know if this issue is still valid!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale marked as a stale issue/pr (usually by a bot) label Feb 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
- Mailling list - Feature request stale marked as a stale issue/pr (usually by a bot)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants