Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enter-ahs-forward does not recognize symbols containing > #7329

Closed
grammati opened this issue Oct 8, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

enter-ahs-forward does not recognize symbols containing > #7329

grammati opened this issue Oct 8, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@grammati
Copy link
Contributor

grammati commented Oct 8, 2016

Description :octocat:

enter-ahs-forward does not recognize clojure symbols containing >.

Reproduction guide 馃

  • Write some clojure code like this:
(defn foo->bar [])
(blah (foo->bar (whatever)))
  • Place point on the symbol foo->bar
  • Press *, for enter-ahs-forward

Observed behaviour: 馃憖 馃挃

  • Point does not move

Expected behaviour: 鉂わ笍 馃槃

  • Point moves to the next occurrence of foo->bar

System Info 馃捇

  • OS: darwin
  • Emacs: 24.5.1
  • Spacemacs: 0.200.0
  • Spacemacs branch: develop (rev. 8961804)
  • Graphic display: nil
  • Distribution: spacemacs
  • Editing style: hybrid
  • Completion: helm
  • Layers:
(slack docker command-log prodigy helm auto-completion emacs-lisp git clojure themes-minipack javascript markdown react restclient scala yaml spell-checking)
@TheBB
Copy link
Collaborator

TheBB commented Oct 8, 2016

Does it work in emacs -q?

@TheBB
Copy link
Collaborator

TheBB commented Oct 8, 2016

Looks like you just have to configure ahs-include to the proper regexp for symbols. It's a mystery to me why this is not simply \s_+ to match symbols according to the major mode's syntax table.

@d12frosted
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing for inactivity. Please let us know if you need help with this.

@TheBB please reopen if you think that it should be fixed in Spacemacs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants