Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2.7][Process] Update in 2.7 for stream-based output storage #17424

Merged

Conversation

romainneutron
Copy link
Contributor

Q A
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets #17390
License MIT

This PR should be rebased once #17423 has been merged. It contains fixes related to methode Process::getErrorOutput and Process::getOutput that do not exist in branch 2.3

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Jan 20, 2016

@romainneutron #17423 merged in 2.7 now, can you rebase?

@romainneutron romainneutron force-pushed the process-use-stream-based-storage-2.7 branch from d53a370 to 2d931f4 Compare January 20, 2016 09:24
@romainneutron
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR rebased

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Jan 20, 2016

Thank you @romainneutron.

@fabpot fabpot merged commit 2d931f4 into symfony:2.7 Jan 20, 2016
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2016
…ge (romainneutron)

This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch.

Discussion
----------

[2.7][Process] Update in 2.7 for stream-based output storage

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix?      | yes
| New feature?  | no
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | #17390
| License       | MIT

This PR should be rebased once #17423 has been merged. It contains fixes related to methode `Process::getErrorOutput` and `Process::getOutput` that do not exist in branch 2.3

Commits
-------

2d931f4 [Process] Use stream based storage to avoid memory issues
@romainneutron romainneutron deleted the process-use-stream-based-storage-2.7 branch January 20, 2016 11:57
@fabpot fabpot mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2016
This was referenced Feb 28, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants