New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sympy 1.6.1 ? #19557
Comments
Which patches are you referring to? |
Note: edited my previous reply (wrong PR numbers before, now it should be fine) |
The normal plan is we would only make a bugfix release (i.e. 1.6.1) if regressions were identified in 1.6 (relative to 1.5.1). Also 1.6.1 would be based off the 1.6 branch rather than master so any fixes need to be cherry-picked to that branch. It's important to say when opening an issue that represents a regression that it is a regression so that any fix could be included in a bugfix release. Until now the only regression I knew of was #19532. |
Yes this was a regression, I apologize if I haven't tagged it correctly, I tried to follow the guidelines but was the first time I PRed into sympy so I may have missed some parts. |
No need to apologise. It's just best to explicitly say if something is a regression and since what version. We can do a 1.6.1 release but I think we need a fix for #19532 first. |
Hi, is there any plan on releasing 1.6.1, just like we had 1.5.1 shortly after 1.5? We're unfortunately stuck with 1.5.1, but the patches we've submitted have already been merged into SymPy master, and we're looking forward to jump to 1.6. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: