New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor dep-div-indep hint #21588
Merged
oscarbenjamin
merged 11 commits into
sympy:master
from
Mohitbalwani26:refactor-dep-div-indep
Jun 12, 2021
Merged
refactor dep-div-indep hint #21588
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
23a4521
refactor dep-div-indep hint
Mohitbalwani26 7ddf5de
refactor indep-div-dep
Mohitbalwani26 e6c7a2e
refactor homogenous coeff best
Mohitbalwani26 64bab8c
fix simplification result
Mohitbalwani26 1f0efcc
refactor linear_coefficients
Mohitbalwani26 065b15b
fix import
Mohitbalwani26 a9f4a3f
change test for _linear_coeff_match
Mohitbalwani26 f8e3d8a
fix sphinx failure
Mohitbalwani26 d706189
fix reference through obj
Mohitbalwani26 59897a2
fix autoclass
Mohitbalwani26 e2867b0
add members to every class
Mohitbalwani26 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -81,15 +81,17 @@ factorable | |
|
||
1st_homogeneous_coeff_best | ||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | ||
.. autofunction:: sympy.solvers.ode.ode::ode_1st_homogeneous_coeff_best | ||
.. autofunction:: sympy.solvers.ode.single::HomogeneousCoeffBest | ||
|
||
1st_homogeneous_coeff_subs_dep_div_indep | ||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | ||
.. autofunction:: sympy.solvers.ode.ode::ode_1st_homogeneous_coeff_subs_dep_div_indep | ||
.. autoclass:: sympy.solvers.ode.single::HomogeneousCoeffSubsDepDivIndep | ||
:members: | ||
|
||
1st_homogeneous_coeff_subs_indep_div_dep | ||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | ||
.. autofunction:: sympy.solvers.ode.ode::ode_1st_homogeneous_coeff_subs_indep_div_dep | ||
.. autoclass:: sympy.solvers.ode.single::HomogeneousCoeffSubsIndepDivDep | ||
:members: | ||
|
||
1st_linear | ||
^^^^^^^^^^ | ||
|
@@ -152,7 +154,7 @@ almost_linear | |
|
||
linear_coefficients | ||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | ||
.. autofunction:: sympy.solvers.ode.ode::ode_linear_coefficients | ||
.. autofunction:: sympy.solvers.ode.single::LinearCoefficients | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should this be There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yes, this should be autoclass. will rectify it |
||
|
||
separable_reduced | ||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do some autoclass blocks have members but others not?
Is it useful to show the members?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
official documentation says if we keep the :members: block then it will include docstrings of member functions also. but in previous class like Factorable, initially it was not there but someone made commit stating 'expanding documentation', so I thought it is the practice to be followed.