Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#192 - Support for exponential form of a complex number. #488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 9, 2021

Conversation

sys27
Copy link
Owner

@sys27 sys27 commented Dec 9, 2021

Close #192.

@sys27 sys27 added this to the xFunc 4.1.0 milestone Dec 9, 2021
@sys27 sys27 self-assigned this Dec 9, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #488 (2ceb176) into dev (67d0c54) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #488   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.42%   99.42%           
=======================================
  Files         179      179           
  Lines        6488     6490    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         6451     6453    +2     
  Misses         37       37           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...Func.Maths/Analyzers/TypeAnalyzers/TypeAnalyzer.cs 99.88% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
xFunc.Maths/Expressions/Pow.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 67d0c54...2ceb176. Read the comment docs.

@sys27 sys27 force-pushed the feature/complex-exponential-form branch from 51c704f to 2ceb176 Compare December 9, 2021 21:27
@sys27 sys27 merged commit bedf784 into dev Dec 9, 2021
@sys27 sys27 deleted the feature/complex-exponential-form branch December 9, 2021 21:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for exponential form of a complex number
1 participant