Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any guidelines for an hq_token_only parameter? #21

Closed
JW-xiilab opened this issue Jun 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Any guidelines for an hq_token_only parameter? #21

JW-xiilab opened this issue Jun 20, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@JW-xiilab
Copy link

JW-xiilab commented Jun 20, 2023

Big applause for such a decent work!

Perhaps, is there any guidelines when using "hq_token_only" parameter in inference stage?

Heuristally, the performance of this paramater seems to be depending on the details of the image(or an object which needed to be masked). Even with the example images given in "demo", some images result in better segementation of the object, while on the other situation, the slightly worse performance on segmenation of details.

If your team also had an heuristic approach to this parameter, would you suggest any ideas when this parameter works more effectively than having it as "False"?

Thanks in advance, and sorry if I have missed the explanation in the paper.

@lkeab
Copy link
Collaborator

lkeab commented Jun 22, 2023

Hi, thanks for watching our work. We provide guidelines for using this parameter in the comments here L69 to L75.

@JW-xiilab
Copy link
Author

Thanks a lot for the reply.

I must have missed that part even while working on that py.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants