Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[admission-controller] Don't let istio to instrument the webhook #222

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 27, 2021

Conversation

nestorsalceda
Copy link
Contributor

@nestorsalceda nestorsalceda commented Aug 27, 2021

Istio and the api-server does not play pretty well together, like pizza
and pineapple:

Chart is open enough for the users to set the podAnnotation with the
api-server instead of not deploying the sidecar in the webhook, but by
default we offer an option that works on most possible scenarios.

What this PR does / why we need it:

Checklist

[Place an '[x]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.]

  • Chart Version bumped
  • Variables are documented in the README.md
  • Title of the PR starts with chart name (e.g. [mychartname])
  • PR only contains changes for one chart

Néstor Salceda added 2 commits August 27, 2021 18:16
Istio and the api-sever does not play pretty well together, like pizza
and pineapple:

* istio/istio#8696
* istio/istio#12187

Chart is open enough for the users to set the podAnnotation with the
api-server instead of not deploying the sidecar in the webhook, but by
default we offer an option that works on most possible scenarios.
@nestorsalceda nestorsalceda merged commit 25b4532 into master Aug 27, 2021
@nestorsalceda nestorsalceda deleted the fix-istio-issue-with-ac branch August 27, 2021 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant