journal-remote: split-mode=host, remove port from journal filename #2080
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When constructing the journal filename to store logs from a remote host, remove the port of the tcp connection, as the port will change with every reboot/connection loss between sender/reveiver machines. Having the port in the filename will cause a new journal file to be created for every reboot or connection loss.
For the implementation, a new argument "bool include_port" is added to the getpeername_pretty() function. This is passed to the sockaddr_pretty() function. The value of the include_port argument is set to true in all calls of getpeername_pretty(), except for 2 calls in journal-remote.c, where it is set to false.
This pull request extends #2078. It actually includes the changes of 2078, so if this pull request is accepted, 2078 can be closed. I created 2078 separately because it is much simpler and it has a distinct functionality