-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nginx fails when jitsi_meet_server_name was changed #20
Comments
We could change the template:
- dest: "/etc/nginx/sites-available/{{ jitsi_meet_server_name }}.conf"
+ dest: "/etc/nginx/sites-available/jitsi-meet.conf"
src: nginx/sites-available/vhost.conf.j2
owner: root
group: root
mode: "0644"
notify: restart nginx |
yep, if it's intended as single-site deployment. actually i'm currently figuring out how to fix the |
i'm not exactly sure what fixed the latter. i purged prosody and its config to redeploy. eventually the issue described in #11 was effective as well. i'm probably providing a patch tomorrow. |
You need to delete the files under |
This reduces the troubles when the designated web domain is renamed. Closes systemli#20
This reduces the troubles when the designated web domain is renamed. Closes systemli#20
This reduces the troubles when the designated web domain is renamed. Closes systemli#20
Hey, I would close this issue because the package from Jitsi Meet works with the server name as file name and it would be very complex to change this behaviour. What do you think? Maybe you can try to discuss this upstream with the maintainers of the debian package? |
i do agree. unfortunately there often too few time to contribute to upstream. maybe it'd make sense to collect a number of issues to make that more fruitful. |
changing
jitsi_meet_server_name
leads to the situation that there are two website configurations in/etc/nginx/sites-enabled
. thus theserver_names_hash_bucket_size
directive is declared twice andnginx
will fail to start.this could either be fixed by allowing just one site configuration or by factoring that out to an extra configuration file. what would you prefer?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: