Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

user-perm: Introduce section on "Privileged Access" #71

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: users_permissions
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

razvand
Copy link
Collaborator

@razvand razvand commented Dec 4, 2021

Introduce contents for section "Privileged Access", part of the users-permissions chapter.

@razvand razvand added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 4, 2021
@razvand razvand self-assigned this Dec 4, 2021
@Sergiu121
Copy link
Collaborator

chapters/users-permissions/privileged-access.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chapters/users-permissions/privileged-access.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chapters/users-permissions/privileged-access.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chapters/users-permissions/privileged-access.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Sergiu121
Copy link
Collaborator

This section arguments the need for a privileged account (root,
supervisor) and ways (and caveats) of accessing the privileged account.
It details common use cases for using the privileged account and typical
situations encountered.

Signed-off-by: Razvan Deaconescu <razvan.deaconescu@cs.pub.ro>
@Sergiu121
Copy link
Collaborator

@razvand razvand changed the title Add section on "Privileged Access" user-perm: Add section on "Privileged Access" Aug 25, 2023
@razvand razvand changed the title user-perm: Add section on "Privileged Access" user-perm: Introduce section on "Privileged Access" Aug 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants