You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just ran into a situation where I had a Note: block in my paper that wanted to talk about a "note" in a paragraph quoted from another standard...
Modify [class.copy.elision]/3 as follows:
> If the first overload resolution fails or was not performed, <del>or if the
> type of the first parameter of the selected constructor is not an rvalue reference
> to the object's type (possibly cv-qualified),</del> overload resolution is performed
> again, considering the object as an lvalue.
> [*Note:* This two-stage overload resolution must be performed regardless of whether
> copy elision will occur. It determines the constructor to be called if elision is not
> performed, and the selected constructor must be accessible even if the call is
> elided. —*end note*]
Note: I believe that the two instances of the word "constructor" in the note
remain correct. [...] The note is correct when it says that this constructor
must be accessible even if elision is performed.
A reviewer was confused: is my Note: talking about itself? He suggested changing "the note" to "the quoted note" (or "the note in the quotation above" or something) to clarify what's happening here.
It strikes me that a more concise solution would be if I could replace Note: with something like Remark: or Sidebar: — still styled exactly like a Bikeshed "note", but without using the word "Note" anywhere in the styling. I tried this:
<div class="note" header="Remark:">
I believe that the two instances of the word "constructor" in the note
remain correct. [...] The note is correct when it says that this constructor
must be accessible even if elision is performed.
</div>
but this actually renders both the specified header and the word "NOTE:", so that it displays as a green box containing "NOTE: REMARK: I believe...". That's certainly not what I was going for!
Is there a way to accomplish what I want, already? Could one be added (e.g. by handling a really_actually_header="Remark:" attribute on the div)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The heading attribute just auto-adds a <div class=marker> to your container, holding the parsed HTML contents of the attribute value, and prepended with "Note:"/etc.
I just ran into a situation where I had a
Note:
block in my paper that wanted to talk about a "note" in a paragraph quoted from another standard...A reviewer was confused: is my
Note:
talking about itself? He suggested changing "the note" to "the quoted note" (or "the note in the quotation above" or something) to clarify what's happening here.It strikes me that a more concise solution would be if I could replace
Note:
with something likeRemark:
orSidebar:
— still styled exactly like a Bikeshed "note", but without using the word "Note" anywhere in the styling. I tried this:but this actually renders both the specified header and the word "NOTE:", so that it displays as a green box containing "NOTE: REMARK: I believe...". That's certainly not what I was going for!
Is there a way to accomplish what I want, already? Could one be added (e.g. by handling a
really_actually_header="Remark:"
attribute on the div)?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: