Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[refactor] Remove DFS in DOT generation #1896

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 26, 2020
Merged

Conversation

k-ye
Copy link
Member

@k-ye k-ye commented Sep 26, 2020

No point doing DFS if simply iterating over nodes_ can get the work done..

[Click here for the format server]


Copy link
Collaborator

@xumingkuan xumingkuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1896 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1896   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   43.81%   43.81%           
=======================================
  Files          45       45           
  Lines        6174     6174           
  Branches     1097     1097           
=======================================
  Hits         2705     2705           
  Misses       3300     3300           
  Partials      169      169           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6ac1a54...871d5e0. Read the comment docs.

@k-ye k-ye merged commit 27f59d0 into taichi-dev:master Sep 26, 2020
@k-ye k-ye deleted the no-dfs branch September 26, 2020 07:53
@yuanming-hu yuanming-hu mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants