feat(protocol): revert Bridge receive() checks

[dantaik]

Some integration tests fails after the recent change, so I'm reverting the change and will investigate later.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #13128 (cbc0da6) into main (ff99f50) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #13128   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.85%   62.85%           
=======================================
  Files         113      113           
  Lines        3209     3209           
  Branches      434      434           
=======================================
  Hits         2017     2017           
  Misses       1116     1116           
  Partials       76       76           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
bridge-ui	92.61% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from ff99f50
protocol	53.34% <100.00%> (ø)
relayer	69.15% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from ff99f50
ui	100.00% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from ff99f50

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/protocol/contracts/bridge/Bridge.sol	46.66% <ø> (ø)
...ackages/protocol/contracts/bridge/BridgedERC20.sol	95.65% <ø> (ø)
packages/protocol/contracts/bridge/TokenVault.sol	50.57% <ø> (ø)
...protocol/contracts/bridge/libs/LibBridgeStatus.sol	60.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more