Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sharing iP code quality feedback [for @tanyutao544] #3

Open
nus-se-bot opened this issue Feb 12, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Sharing iP code quality feedback [for @tanyutao544] #3

nus-se-bot opened this issue Feb 12, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@nus-se-bot
Copy link

@tanyutao544 We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the iP code further.

IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.

Aspect: Tab Usage

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods

Example from src/main/java/duke/tasks/Task.java lines 10-10:

    protected boolean marked;

Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-sounding prefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)

Aspect: Brace Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Package Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Dead Code

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Method Length

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class size

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Header Comments

Example from src/main/java/duke/commands/Command.java lines 14-20:

    /**
     * Abstract method for the execution of command
     *
     * @param tasks   tasks list to be modified
     * @param ui      to help with printing of messages
     * @param storage To deal with saving of task list
     */

Example from src/main/java/duke/parser/Parser.java lines 24-29:

    /**
     * Method to process the users input into respective command
     * @param input Users input to be processed
     * @return Corresponding command if valid input
     * @throws DukeException if input is invalid or missing details
     */

Example from src/main/java/duke/parser/Parser.java lines 89-93:

    /**
     * Method to check input string is a valid string of integers
     * @param input String input to be checked
     * @return true if input is all integers false is not
     */

Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.

Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

ℹ️ The bot account @nus-se-bot used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sg if you want to follow up on this post.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant