You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@tanyutao544 We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the iP code further.
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-sounding prefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)
/** * Abstract method for the execution of command * * @param tasks tasks list to be modified * @param ui to help with printing of messages * @param storage To deal with saving of task list */
/** * Method to process the users input into respective command * @param input Users input to be processed * @return Corresponding command if valid input * @throws DukeException if input is invalid or missing details */
/** * Method to check input string is a valid string of integers * @param input String input to be checked * @return true if input is all integers false is not */
Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
ℹ️ The bot account @nus-se-bot used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sg if you want to follow up on this post.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@tanyutao544 We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the iP code further.
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
Example from
src/main/java/duke/tasks/Task.java
lines10-10
:Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-sounding prefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Dead Code
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class size
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Header Comments
Example from
src/main/java/duke/commands/Command.java
lines14-20
:Example from
src/main/java/duke/parser/Parser.java
lines24-29
:Example from
src/main/java/duke/parser/Parser.java
lines89-93
:Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
ℹ️ The bot account @nus-se-bot used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact
cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sg
if you want to follow up on this post.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: