You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for the great theme. I am enjoying creating a documentation website with it!
I noticed that the Develop and Master branches don't really make sense right now (Network Graph).
Specifically, the Develop branch is missing a few commits from Master (one of those commits is actually duplicated in both branches, at different times, and different authors).
I propose adopting the popular branching model: Gitflow; I also think using verioning will help advance the project.
To do this, we should:
Merge Master into Develop
Merge contributions via pull request only to Develop
When ready, merge Develop into Master and bump the version number.
The reason why I made this issue is that I am not really sure what branch is more complete....they both seem to have small differences that should be included in both branches.
Take a look at my Develop fork with the current Master merged in.
Any thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for the great theme. I am enjoying creating a documentation website with it!
I noticed that the Develop and Master branches don't really make sense right now (Network Graph).
Specifically, the Develop branch is missing a few commits from Master (one of those commits is actually duplicated in both branches, at different times, and different authors).
I propose adopting the popular branching model: Gitflow; I also think using verioning will help advance the project.
To do this, we should:
The reason why I made this issue is that I am not really sure what branch is more complete....they both seem to have small differences that should be included in both branches.
Take a look at my Develop fork with the current Master merged in.
Any thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: