-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Editorial: Simplify the |NumericLiteral| grammar #3096
Open
gibson042
wants to merge
3
commits into
tc39:main
Choose a base branch
from
gibson042:2023-06-simplify-numeric-literal-grammar
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might there be a better name than CanonicalDecimalIntegerLiteral? It makes me think “canonical numeric string”, which corresponds to neither a superset nor subset of the sequences this production matches.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, suggestions welcome. But the similarity to "canonical numeric string" is intentional, and the two concepts do mostly agree where they intersect—not for power-of-two numbers large enough that Number::toString uses exponential notation, but I'm willing to chalk that up as a difference between canonicalized numeric strings vs. integer literals (numeric strings and integer literals already being distinct with respect to e.g. supporting
_
separators).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even without exponential notation, stuff beyond safe integer range won’t always be canonical in the CNS sense, right? For example the source text literal
9007199254740993
evaluates to the Number value whose canonical string representation is9007199254740992
.In that case, perhaps I’m alone in thinking the word might be misleading there, so unless others have an opinion it’s probably not worth changing.