Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Omit Depends: from control file if not set. Fixes #208 #209

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 23, 2016

Conversation

rspieldenner
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tcurdt
Copy link
Owner

tcurdt commented Jun 6, 2015

Thanks for the pull request. Just not sure how handle the migration properly.
The least we would need is some kind of warning for those who use the default value currently.

tcurdt added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2016
Omit Depends: from control file if not set. Fixes #208
@tcurdt tcurdt merged commit d9b8ae4 into tcurdt:master Jan 23, 2016
jacobwil added a commit to enveil/jdeb that referenced this pull request May 28, 2019
…s set.

When the change to no longer include the default depends was made in tcurdt#209 to fix tcurdt#208 it entirely eliminated the ability to set the depends programatically. In fact, the field DebMaker.depends is never read.
tcurdt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2019
* Do include the depends field in the control file if and only if it was set.

When the change to no longer include the default depends was made in #209 to fix #208 it entirely eliminated the ability to set the depends programatically. In fact, the field DebMaker.depends is never read.

* Add unit test for ensuring depends is in control.

Also augment DebMakerTestCase#testDependsIsOmittedWhenEmpty to fail if control is missing entirely.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants