Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TG2-VALIDATION_KINGDOM_NOTEMPTY #216

Open
Tasilee opened this issue Jan 28, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

TG2-VALIDATION_KINGDOM_NOTEMPTY #216

Tasilee opened this issue Jan 28, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
Completeness CORE TG2 CORE tests NAME Test Tests created by TG2, either CORE, Supplementary or DO NOT IMPLEMENT TG2 Validation

Comments

@Tasilee
Copy link
Collaborator

Tasilee commented Jan 28, 2024

TestField Value
GUID 36ed36c9-b1a7-40b2-b5e2-0d012e772098
Label VALIDATION_KINGDOM_NOTEMPTY
Description Is there a value in dwc:kingdom?
TestType Validation
Darwin Core Class Taxon
Information Elements ActedUpon dwc:kingdom
Information Elements Consulted
Expected Response COMPLIANT if dwc:kingdom is not EMPTY; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT
Data Quality Dimension Completeness
Term-Actions KINGDOM_NOTEMPTY
Parameter(s)
Source Authority
Specification Last Updated 2024-01-28
Examples [dwc:kingdom="Fungi": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:kingdom is not EMPTY"]
[dwc:kingdom="": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=NOT_COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:kingdom is EMPTY"]
Source TG2
References
Example Implementations (Mechanisms)
Link to Specification Source Code
Notes
@Tasilee Tasilee added TG2 NAME Test Tests created by TG2, either CORE, Supplementary or DO NOT IMPLEMENT Supplementary Tests supplementary to the core test suite. These are tests that the team regarded as not CORE. Completeness Validation labels Jan 28, 2024
@Tasilee Tasilee closed this as completed Feb 4, 2024
@chicoreus
Copy link
Collaborator

This one is reasonable as is, for almost all purposes the absence of a value in dwc:Kingdom indicates a data quality issue.

@chicoreus
Copy link
Collaborator

This one could reasonably go into CORE.

@Tasilee
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Tasilee commented Feb 19, 2024

I bow to others on this. I can see a case for CORE as a VALIDATION (rather than an ISSUE). PLEASE INDICATE - I have added NEEDS WORK for this. The stats are interesting

88% of GBIF records NOTEMPTY
29% of ALA records NOTEMPTY

@Tasilee Tasilee reopened this Feb 19, 2024
@ArthurChapman
Copy link
Collaborator

I agree to CORE - no one has suggested ISSUE have they? I think @chicoreus was using issue in a generic sense

@Tasilee Tasilee added CORE TG2 CORE tests and removed Supplementary Tests supplementary to the core test suite. These are tests that the team regarded as not CORE. NEEDS WORK labels Feb 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Completeness CORE TG2 CORE tests NAME Test Tests created by TG2, either CORE, Supplementary or DO NOT IMPLEMENT TG2 Validation
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants