Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lifeStage #35

Closed
tucotuco opened this issue Nov 13, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

lifeStage #35

tucotuco opened this issue Nov 13, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

Was https://code.google.com/p/darwincore/issues/detail?id=198

Reported by jchataig@mnhn.fr, Nov 28, 2013

Term Name:LifeStage
This issue is linked with issue 36.
The definition of lifeStage is "The age class or life stage of the biological individual(s) at the time the Occurrence was recorded. Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary."
The example add the possibility to add the count : "2 adults 4 juveniles"

So the example extend the definition of the term (2 notions) : life stage and count.

Recommendation:
My recommandation is to make that one term refers to one and only one notion to make the data easier to reuse.
If this information on count of individual by life stage is important : it needs to be exchange in its own term like "AdultCount", "JuvenilCount" or another way to stock this information must be created.

If only the global count is needed, I think people should use the terms IndividualCount = 6 ; and lifeStage :" adult juvenile"

If this change is not possible, I think it's important to make the definition and the example congruent : erase the example on the count on lifeStage or extend the definition with the possibility to add count. This last option seems to be the worst to make easier the reuse of the data.

Submitter: Julie Chataigner jchataig@mnhn

Nov 29, 2013 comment #1 wixner
Fully support this. Darwin Core should recommend simple values for terms where possible and avoid using a single term for complex data. For lifeStage I would follow Julies recommendation and only list life stages and if individualCount is given it should be for all individuals no matter which sex or life stage they have. It might be worth to recommend to use the measurements and facts extension for the detailed breakdown if one wishes to publish counts per sex and/or life stage

Dec 3, 2013 comment #2 gtuco.btuco
I also agree.

@tucotuco tucotuco added this to the 19 Feb 2015 milestone Jan 19, 2015
@tucotuco tucotuco self-assigned this Jan 20, 2015
@tucotuco tucotuco removed this from the 19 Feb 2015 milestone Jan 20, 2015
@tucotuco tucotuco added this to the 5 Mar 2015 milestone Feb 5, 2015
@tucotuco
Copy link
Member Author

Sent message to tdwg-content recommending that the definitions as presented originally be accepted. Reset pubic review milestone for 26 Apr 2015.

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member Author

tucotuco commented May 7, 2018

Fixed in commit df05056.

@tucotuco tucotuco closed this as completed May 7, 2018
@ianengelbrecht
Copy link

See discussion on dwc:sex

@ianengelbrecht ianengelbrecht mentioned this issue Oct 10, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants