Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can be rancher installed on nodes in public subnet? #5

Closed
risayew opened this issue Jan 21, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Can be rancher installed on nodes in public subnet? #5

risayew opened this issue Jan 21, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@risayew
Copy link

risayew commented Jan 21, 2019

No description provided.

@risayew risayew closed this as completed Mar 18, 2019
@techcto
Copy link
Owner

techcto commented Mar 18, 2019 via email

@risayew
Copy link
Author

risayew commented Mar 18, 2019

Oh, thank you! It was going quiet well with rancher 2.0 and cloud formation(i have even managed to add persistence storage via rancher UI by enabling aws cloud provider somewhere in config. although rancher cluster was running on public subnet-that was my issue here), until we decided to use Fargate for setup of our application. It was actually better decision, because hosting Rancher on 3xEC2 instances was rather expensive + Application itself needs additional Kubernetes cluster. So i removed rancher 2.0 from aws for the moment. But for next project i have plans to setup rancher 2.0 on Exoscale using terraform.

@risayew
Copy link
Author

risayew commented Mar 18, 2019

To be honest, i can't find good place for rancher if we are talking about "customer" applications. We are using rancher 1.6 on our private hosting for our infrastructure applications like gitlab, registries, pm-tool etc. But for customer applications everytime more thrifty variant will be chosen at the end. May be a kind of portability argument can play here for pro rancher decisions. But who wants portable backend? )

@techcto
Copy link
Owner

techcto commented Mar 19, 2019 via email

@risayew
Copy link
Author

risayew commented Mar 19, 2019

Thank you for rancher templates! I have learned many new things for me.
Actually as i know, at the moment there is no possibility to use persistent storage with Fargate. In our application we could omit the persistence layer: we use just bucket and RDS. All other configuration is done via env. variables, i.e. via params.
Interesting, I will take a look on your project. Of course i will tell you my ideas, if any good comes to my mind.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants