fix: resolve TODO comments #209
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
it uses MarshalJSON/UnmarshalJSON instead of default proto things.
this task now has a separate issue: tendermint#208
since we validate genesis state at the beginning of the function, `CurrentEpochDays` is always not 0.
there is no need to check actual value of `HistoricalRewards` in this test.
|
@hallazzang Could you resolve a conflict? |
|
@dongsam Yes it's done now |
dongsam
approved these changes
Nov 8, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Resolve TODO comments, finish undone tasks.
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)godoccomments.Files changedin the Github PR explorerCodecov Reportin the comment section below once CI passes