You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Change examples in Tendermint specifications in proposer selection for consistency.
Problem Definition
What problems may be addressed by introducing this change?
The examples have, in my opinion, some minor mistakes.
What benefits does Tendermint stand to gain by including this change?
Specs are easier to understand.
Are there any disadvantages of including this change? --> I don't think so
Proposal
Validator Removal
The priority should be from -3 to 3
After new step, the priority from p1 should increase by 1 from 2 to 3 as it has VP 1
New Validator
The new proposer priority of p3 should be set to -13 and not -4 in Alg step
Proposer Priority Change
After you add p2 and run a selection, the priority of p1 is 45k and of p2 is -45k. The signs a flipped in the first Table.
PS: I failed to do the rebase in #9326, so I am abandoning it and trying to do it right from the start, starting with an issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Protocol Change Proposal
Summary
Change examples in Tendermint specifications in proposer selection for consistency.
Problem Definition
What problems may be addressed by introducing this change?
The examples have, in my opinion, some minor mistakes.
What benefits does Tendermint stand to gain by including this change?
Specs are easier to understand.
Are there any disadvantages of including this change? --> I don't think so
Proposal
Validator Removal
The priority should be from -3 to 3
After new step, the priority from p1 should increase by 1 from 2 to 3 as it has VP 1
New Validator
The new proposer priority of p3 should be set to -13 and not -4 in Alg step
Proposer Priority Change
After you add p2 and run a selection, the priority of p1 is 45k and of p2 is -45k. The signs a flipped in the first Table.
PS: I failed to do the rebase in #9326, so I am abandoning it and trying to do it right from the start, starting with an issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: