Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove strict_deps = False and update dependencies in some sass rules. #6818

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

arcra
Copy link
Member

@arcra arcra commented Mar 29, 2024

Googlers see cl/617525193.

Also ran buildifier to format BUILD files. (Linter step was failing from CI run for this change).

@arcra arcra requested a review from bmd3k March 29, 2024 21:43
@arcra
Copy link
Member Author

arcra commented Apr 2, 2024

Updated with the appropriate angular material dependency reference. PTAL.

load("@rules_python//python:py_binary.bzl", "py_binary")
load("@rules_python//python:py_library.bzl", "py_library")
load("@rules_python//python:py_test.bzl", "py_test")
load("//tensorboard/defs:py_repl.bzl", "py_repl")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This (and other files) were not in the original CL. Is this from your buildifier run? If so, which version of buildifier are you using? CI uses 3.0.0. Looks like this is 3.0.0 compatible, though (but so was the old order).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I just ran the command, hoping that my machine would find it, but it looks like it used an internal, more recent version.

I used the download_buildifier.sh script from our repo, just like the CI workflow does, to get that same version, reverted the previous commit, and ran that command from the CI workflow, without the --mode=check flag.

For future reference, is there an easier/better way to accomplish this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if there is an easier/better way to accomplish. I basically did/do the same as you describe.

@arcra arcra merged commit 81e1393 into tensorflow:master Apr 2, 2024
13 checks passed
@arcra arcra deleted the sass_patch branch April 2, 2024 19:37
AnuarTB pushed a commit to AnuarTB/tensorboard that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
…es. (tensorflow#6818)

Googlers see cl/617525193.

Also ran `buildifier` to format BUILD files. (Linter step was failing
from CI run for this change).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants