Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[XLA] Add a 'custom' fusion op type #10319

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 26, 2017

Conversation

DavidNorman
Copy link
Contributor

This allows backends that may have fusions that are not included in the main enumeration.

@tensorflow-jenkins
Copy link
Collaborator

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@martinwicke
Copy link
Member

@eliben are you reviewing this?

@martinwicke martinwicke added the awaiting review Pull request awaiting review label Jun 14, 2017
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ class HloInstruction {
kTransposeDot, // Fused into a dot with transposed operands.
kConvBackwardFilter, // Fused into a backward filter convolution.
kConvBackwardInput, // Fused into a backward input convolution.

kCustom, // Custom fusions.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you elaborate a bit more in this comment, mentioning backend-specific fustions

@martinwicke
Copy link
Member

Jenkins, test this please.

@martinwicke martinwicke added awaiting testing (then merge) and removed awaiting review Pull request awaiting review labels Jun 16, 2017
@DavidNorman
Copy link
Contributor Author

cool - thanks

@DavidNorman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@martinwicke Hi there. Could this be merged now? Cheers

@drpngx drpngx merged commit 94dd8a3 into tensorflow:master Jun 26, 2017
allenlavoie pushed a commit to allenlavoie/tensorflow that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2017
* Add a 'custom' fusion op type

* Improve the description of the fusion type
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants