New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Keras backend functionality changed? #14248
Comments
@fchollet any reason tile not included in tensorflow/python/keras/backend/init.py? |
Thanks for reporting this, it seems like it was omitted from the list of symbols that are part of the public API. We'll fix it in the next release. Have you noticed this for any other symbol than |
@fchollet Could the tf keras and backend import become simpler for the next release? Perhaps: Any reasonable and easy to use option would be fantastic! If nothing else better documentation of the current preferred way to import keras and the backend would also be helpful. |
It has been 14 days with no activity and the |
According to your Python or Anaconda version ....install perfect version of tensorflow and keras otherwise it will give error. |
A member of the TensorFlow organization has replied after the stat:awaiting tensorflower label was applied. |
Closing since it looks like the issue was resolved. Feel free to reopen. |
I've run into this using tf1.13.1 and 1.12 (not sure minor version) on osx: import tensorflow.keras.backend as K On ubuntu, it's present in 1.13.0-dev20190208 but not in 1.12.0 |
Hi,
I have been using keras from within tensorflow since it was included into the contrib package - but it seems that in the 1.4 release the keras backend is missing some functionality ...
For example:
Whereas in tensorflow 1.1:
And using pure keras:
Is this just an omission, or has the functionality been deliberately removed? I know I can use the equivalent tensorflow operation - but it's nice to be able to use a reasonably portable api and if I wanted to switch backend I could just change the import path. I also try not too mix keras and tensorflow too much as I think the code is more readable just using one!
Regards,
Alex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: