Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apply quantization denylisting at QuantizePass instead of LiftQuantizableSpotsAsFunctionsPass. #63261

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

Apply quantization denylisting at QuantizePass instead of LiftQuantizableSpotsAsFunctionsPass.

Instead of removing quantization related attributes from LiftQuantizableSpotsAsFunctionsPass when a denylisted quantizable unit is found,
apply denylisting at the point of quantization within QuantizePass.

@copybara-service copybara-service bot force-pushed the test_613499150 branch 3 times, most recently from dc9a05d to 7afe8dc Compare March 11, 2024 23:48
…tizableSpotsAsFunctionsPass`.

Instead of removing quantization related attributes from `LiftQuantizableSpotsAsFunctionsPass` when a denylisted quantizable unit is found,
apply denylisting at the point of quantization within `QuantizePass`.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 614842939
@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit a8b9d31 into master Mar 12, 2024
1 check passed
@copybara-service copybara-service bot deleted the test_613499150 branch March 12, 2024 01:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant