Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the check for positive resharding costs from the request validation code, and mention in our problem formulation description, that some edges can have negative costs. #63520

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

@copybara-service copybara-service bot commented Mar 12, 2024

Remove the check for positive resharding costs from the request validation code, and mention in our problem formulation description, that some edges can have negative costs.

@copybara-service copybara-service bot changed the title Remove the check for positive resharding costs from the request validation code. Remove the check for positive resharding costs from the request validation code, and mention in our problem formulation description, that some edges can have negative costs. Mar 19, 2024
…ation code, and mention in our problem formulation description, that some edges can have negative costs.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 617209988
@copybara-service copybara-service bot closed this Mar 19, 2024
@copybara-service copybara-service bot deleted the test_615087650 branch March 19, 2024 17:46
@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit 558d980 into master Mar 19, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant