Include in-process sources/sinks in status output #1852
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dominiklohmann
force-pushed
the
story/ch26800/in-process-sources-status
branch
from
3ddb840 to
0d21b45
Compare
tobim
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📔 Description
This changes the exclusion of sources/sinks from the status output such that only remote sources/sinks are skipped. It also fixes a segfault in the status handler of the SOURCE actor and DATAGRAM SOURCE broker.
📝 Checklist
🎯 Review Instructions
Try locally.