Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is terminusdb-store able to handle hundred billion triples for current version? #48

Closed
leonqli opened this issue Oct 6, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@leonqli
Copy link

leonqli commented Oct 6, 2020

We have a large triple store (over 50 billion triples) in virtuoso and want to know if terminudb can handle graph of this size or plan to do this. Thanks!

@luke-feeney
Copy link
Member

Hey @leonqli we certainly plan to be able to handle a graph that size. We haven't fully tested yet on 50 billion triples, but would be interested in helping you to test.

@leonqli
Copy link
Author

leonqli commented Dec 16, 2020

Thanks @luke-feeney! It would be interesting to see some comparison to those known triple stores in performances in handling large graph, such as https://www.w3.org/wiki/LargeTripleStores.

@Cheukting Cheukting added this to Needs triage in Mega Issues and Doc Triage Feb 18, 2021
@matko matko added this to actual-triage in Core dev (old) Mar 5, 2021
@matko matko moved this from triage to Now in Core dev (old) Mar 8, 2021
@GavinMendelGleason GavinMendelGleason moved this from Needs triage to High priority in Mega Issues and Doc Triage Mar 15, 2021
@luke-feeney luke-feeney removed this from High priority in Mega Issues and Doc Triage Mar 15, 2021
@spl spl moved this from Next to Later in Core dev (old) Aug 23, 2021
@spl spl unassigned matko Nov 15, 2021
@spl
Copy link
Contributor

spl commented Nov 15, 2021

We're working on it! Thanks for your interest.

@spl spl closed this as completed Nov 15, 2021
Core dev (old) automation moved this from Later to Done Nov 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants