Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dns_mx_record: name optional (#5199) #5205

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 18, 2019
Merged

Conversation

phires
Copy link
Contributor

@phires phires commented Dec 18, 2019

fixes #5199

@phires phires changed the title Issue5199 dns_mx_record: name optional (#5199) Dec 18, 2019
@katbyte katbyte added this to the v1.40.0 milestone Dec 18, 2019
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this PR @phires! LGTM 👍

@katbyte katbyte merged commit ebc37cd into hashicorp:master Dec 18, 2019
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 8, 2020

This has been released in version 1.40.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 1.40.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 28, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 28, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

MX records in azurerm_dns_mx_record unable to provide for the domain, and the docs are wrong
2 participants