Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add missing system user resources #322

Merged

Conversation

dokmic
Copy link
Contributor

@dokmic dokmic commented Dec 21, 2023

This PR adds the following resources:

  • routeros_system_user_aaa;
  • routeros_system_user_group;
  • routeros_system_user_settings.

@dokmic dokmic requested a review from a team as a code owner December 21, 2023 17:11
@dokmic dokmic force-pushed the feature/missing-user-resources branch from 35db1b8 to 97a5a66 Compare December 27, 2023 12:59
Optional: true,
Elem: &schema.Schema{
Type: schema.TypeString,
ValidateFunc: validation.StringInSlice([]string{
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, Michael!
Please add tests for resources so that we can track operability on different ROS versions.
I am ready to add a resource for a group like this, but maybe it would be better to use semantics like in CLI in one line with ValidationMultiValInSlice validator?
name="read" policy=local,telnet,ssh,reboot,read,test,winbox,password,web,sniff,sensitive,api,romon,rest-api,!ftp,!write,!write,!policy

@vaerh vaerh merged commit 78ce5be into terraform-routeros:main Jan 5, 2024
3 checks passed
@vaerh
Copy link
Collaborator

vaerh commented Jan 5, 2024

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.29.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@vaerh vaerh added the released label Jan 5, 2024
@dokmic dokmic deleted the feature/missing-user-resources branch March 7, 2024 09:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants