Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a generic fuel performance plugin #39

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 19, 2020

Conversation

sammiller11235
Copy link
Contributor

Similar to the other generic plugins, this will be a central place
to put settings, parameters, executers, etc. that are expected to
be shared across a variety of fuel performance plugins.

Similar to the other generic plugins, this will be a central place
to put settings, parameters, executers, etc. that are expected to
be shared across a variety of fuel performance plugins.
@ntouran ntouran requested a review from youngmit March 18, 2020 23:38
Copy link
Contributor

@youngmit youngmit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am pretty happy with this. I do think it is worth considering comments providing a "where to go from here" for the inevitable LWR fuel performance person the sees this and is surprised by this weird "bond removal" stuff. Food for thought.

More importantly, missing a couple of license headers

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
"""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add license header

Comment on lines 16 to 19
In many cases, fuel performance is coupled with neutronic analysis as well,
because the fission gases are strong neutron absorbers. In some reactors,
significant composition changes during irradiation can influence neutronics
as well (e.g. sodium thermal bond being squeezed out of pins.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is pretty SFR-specific. We may want to throw a bone to LWR folks. Maybe even mention CRUD/CIPS, even though we have yet to define parameters for them?

It is even possible that the types of parameters that an LWR fuel performance person is interested in are completely different from what an SFR person is interested in. We may want to discuss this somewhere.

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
"""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

license header

…e fuel performance plugin overview to apply more generally.
@youngmit youngmit merged commit 66c4b9a into terrapower:master Mar 19, 2020
@sammiller11235 sammiller11235 deleted the plugin-fuelPerformance branch March 19, 2020 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants