-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 694
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Battery Health - LFP "Usable (new)" calculation not realistic #3509
Comments
I have a 2022 SR+ Model 3 which was the first official 2022 cars delivered in North-America (Canada) with LFP batteries as I received it in January (In the USA few SR+ LFP cars have been shipped in Autumn 2021 as part of a testing effort if I recall it). I don The only difference that I am observing is about the expected results that show an "Usable (new)" value of 60.8, while I receive a 60.4 value. |
Reporting from Germany. :) I am just wondering because in (#3311) it states: Meaning the Battery Capacity calculation should not have changed compared to the "Non LFP - Battery Health". I had a similar issue with in original Custom Dashboard: It got resolved in his issue: |
Works for me with 03/2022 SR, too. 61.0 kWh usable (new). |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
The issue still remains for me with 1.28.5. |
Is there an existing issue for this?
What happened?
The new Battery Health - LFP dashboard shows me 83.7 kWh for a new battery. I have a late 2021 SR+ Model 3 with the 60/62 kWh LFP battery.
![Bildschirmfoto 2023-11-27 um 23 47 57](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/36551243/286046107-12c8a2f8-9fcb-482e-8a61-44dbcf24092e.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.dcIV19zdWbWZt_91vnUqYNNyIHkVzxn4YviXJNuN9QA)
Expected Behavior
The normal Battery Health Dashboard shows correct values:
![Bildschirmfoto 2023-11-27 um 23 48 21](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/36551243/286046262-77a67405-9219-4e13-83e5-c3b378ea7630.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.B0Y6NuirXY6JVu8SWfWhi11PdchKHoeQdFqCFJWlSXk)
Steps To Reproduce
No response
Relevant log output
Screenshots
No response
Additional data
No response
Type of installation
Docker
Version
v1.28.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: