Looking for your Tessel...

[Student007]

As discussed here I open as recommended this issue.

I would prefer to replace
ogs.info('Looking for your Tessel...');
with something like this (e.g.):

if(opts.lan) {
  logs.info('Searching nearby LAN (netmask) for Tessels...');
} else if(opts.usb) {
  logs.info('Searching your Tessel connected to USB...');
} else {
  logs.info('Searching USB and nearby LAN (netmask) for Tessels...');
} 

Of cause there would be a better wording but I feel the current wording is only fitting if someone owns a single Tessel.
Also if you are on a HackEvent, you would use the same WLAN what means you will find multiple Tessels. Following the given wording, I think it is finding to much Tessels. It would match if it only would find Tessels are provisioned with your computer.

[johnnyman727]

I think Looking for your Tessel is more appropriate because even if there are multiple Tessels around, the CLI is trying to find the single Tessel that you want to operate on (since you can only operate on one at a time). Users can be passing in other options (--usb or --lan or --name) to help the CLI narrow down all the discovered Tessels to the single one they want to use.

[Student007]

@johnnyman727 close because finally you ever be right 😉