-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OEM_LSTM_ONLY very slow #632
Comments
Hi, Did you test it with the Tesseract command line? |
Also see comments in #40
ShreeDevi
…____________________________________________________________
भजन - कीर्तन - आरती @ http://bhajans.ramparivar.com
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Amit D. ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
Did you test it with the Tesseract command line?
How did you compile it? Did you use debug mode?
Can you provide an image?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#632 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE2_o4UvfX-7cir3Ccmjn66P-oI1oZibks5rN11JgaJpZM4LYrS->
.
|
Debug mode is known to be ~50x slower than optimized mode. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Using Tesseract 4 (libtesseract) in my project decipher_text.
When I use OEM_TESSERACT_ONLY, it takes little over 7-8 seconds to complete the recognization of a page in English. But when I try to instead use OEM_LSTM_ONLY, it takes 10-15 minutes, if not more, to do the same. I am using i5 2400. Ubuntu 16.04 x86_64.
Part of code where this is used:
if (ocrUnit->process->Init(tessDataPath, languageArg, tesseract::OEM_LSTM_ONLY)){
//Again, handle error here
//
//
//
//
}
Entire file in which it was used could be seen here. (Note: File is from an older, stabler version)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: