You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my case it would use the platform.instance.name as a basis and thus I was getting the 64 bit box rahter than the chef/ubuntu-12.04-i386 box I specified in the driver config.
It would be awesome if this would go into a kitchen-vagrant release, since vagrant 1.6 is out for quite a while already. Any plans for the next (0.16.0?) release already?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
just another issue that the 0.15.0 behaviour (i.e. the need to specify both box + box_url for atlas hosted boxes) causes is that the box version is always reported as 0:
W:\>vagrant box list
chef/ubuntu-12.04-i386 (virtualbox, 0)
chef/ubuntu-14.04 (virtualbox, 0)
(these boxes were downloaded / added as part of a kitchenci w/ kitchen-vagrant 0.15.0 run)
I we could use the "$account/$boxname" syntax that came with vagrant 1.6 this would work properly with box versioning too...
Just stumbled across hard to track down ssh connection timeouts while trying to get kitchenci run on a Hyper-V build worker.
I was under the definitive impression that I was using a 32-bit box. My
.kitchen.yml
here:However, as of
0.15.0
thedefault_box_url
is ALWAYS generated:https://github.com/test-kitchen/kitchen-vagrant/blob/v0.15.0/lib/kitchen/driver/vagrant.rb#L108-114
In my case it would use the
platform.instance.name
as a basis and thus I was getting the 64 bit box rahter than thechef/ubuntu-12.04-i386
box I specified in the driver config.In master there is a fix to make the above example work as expected with Vagrant 1.6+ where only the box name is needed:
https://github.com/test-kitchen/kitchen-vagrant/blob/master/lib/kitchen/driver/vagrant.rb#L115-L116
It would be awesome if this would go into a kitchen-vagrant release, since vagrant 1.6 is out for quite a while already. Any plans for the next (0.16.0?) release already?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: