Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accept Chef Workstation license when users have Policyfile #1573

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 18, 2019

Conversation

tyler-ball
Copy link
Contributor

TK shells out to the chef command to interact with the Policyfile so
we need to ensure they accept the Chef Workstation license or they get
missing license errors.

@tyler-ball tyler-ball force-pushed the license_policyfile branch 2 times, most recently from 5495f6f to 536bdee Compare July 16, 2019 22:21
TK shells out to the `chef` command to interact with the Policyfile so
we need to ensure they accept the Chef Workstation license or they get
missing license errors.

Signed-off-by: tyler-ball <tball@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: tyler-ball <tball@chef.io>
Copy link

@jonsmorrow jonsmorrow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@afiune afiune left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good to me.

tenor-96796126

What's up with the pipeline though?

@tas50 tas50 merged commit 944fe5c into master Jul 18, 2019
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Sep 16, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 16, 2019
@xorima xorima deleted the license_policyfile branch June 14, 2020 08:53
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants