Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Broken link to .travis.yml example file in docs #4373

Closed
cac03 opened this issue Aug 15, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #6056
Closed

Broken link to .travis.yml example file in docs #4373

cac03 opened this issue Aug 15, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #6056

Comments

@cac03
Copy link
Contributor

cac03 commented Aug 15, 2021

Hello,

the General Docker requirements page refers to a non-existent .travis.yml file in the repository. See the "Linux - Travis CI" row and the "Known issues / tips" column

The file has been removed in the 5d87f61 commit

@kiview
Copy link
Member

kiview commented Aug 16, 2021

Hi @cac03,
thanks for bringing this to our attention, you are completely right. I think the Travis part should be completely removed from General Docker requirements page. We can think about adding it to the Continous Integration section if we still feel the need to have this documented.

@cac03
Copy link
Contributor Author

cac03 commented Aug 16, 2021

@kiview, thanks for your response

Yes, I wasn't sure what exactly would be appropriate to fix this.
I've created a #4374 PR to remove the "Travis CI" part from the page

@rnorth
Copy link
Member

rnorth commented Sep 8, 2021

@kiview I'm not so sure that removing Travis CI entirely is the right thing just because we don't have an example configuration to point people towards...

I'd say that the table certainly needs a refresh, though.

eddumelendez added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2022
eddumelendez added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2022
@kiview kiview added this to the next milestone Oct 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants